GIBERT: Lawmakers Can Defund Planned Parenthood By Trading Conservative Talk For Conservative Action

By Gerard Gibert | May 3rd, 2017 at 9:32 pm

BY: Gerard Gibert / CEO - Venture Technologies

Gerard Gibert is founder and CEO of Ridgeland-based Venture Technologies, a multi-state IT solutions and managed services provider since 1985 with 300 employees in 13 states. Gerard is a frequent business commentator in both academic and media circles on the impact of Washington policy on employers and small businesses.

Filed Under: Abortion, Budget, Contributor, Democrats, Ethics, Feature Stories, Federal Government, Gerard Gibert, Insurance, Leadership, Legislature, Medicaid, Mississippi PEP, MS State Government, Opinion, Politics, Pro-life, Spending, US Congress

It’s past time to end federal funding for Planned Parenthood. But how?

According to Planned Parenthood’s Annual Report, approximately 40% of the abortion providers funding comes from federal grants and reimbursements via taxpayers. The remaining 60% is sourced from private contributions and fees for services. This corresponds with the analysis by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), as well.

The 40% of federal funding equates to more than $500 million annually. These federal monies come in two forms, Medicaid (90%) and Title X Grants (10%). Title X was signed into law in 1970 by President Richard Nixon to fund family planning and related preventative health services.

Medicaid is a fee for service program that pays medical providers a flat “fee” for services delivered. In general, it’s available to children, blind, disabled, elderly and pregnant mothers whose income is at or below 100% of the federal poverty level (FPL). Thirty-one states expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which extended the program to able-bodied adults and also increased the financial threshold to $133% of the FPL. This is noteworthy because Planned Parenthood reports that 75% of their services are provided to those covered by Medicaid.

Title X is administered as a block grant to states, where it is allocated to organizations, such as Planned Parenthood, that provide family planning services. States have historically had some degree of discretion over disbursement of Title X funds. Arkansas, for example bars Title X federal funds from going to providers that also provide pregnancy termination services. In 2016, Florida enacted a law barring providers of abortions from receiving Title X funds, but federal judge Robert Hinkle blocked that law. Hinkle argued that abortion is a constitutional right and that therefore, barring funding of abortion providers is “unconstitutional.” Despite the uncertain outcome of these attempts, one still questions why states haven’t been more aggressive in declining to distribute Title X funds to abortion services providers, such as Planned Parenthood.

Now in accordance with the Hyde Amendment, federal monies cannot directly fund abortion services. However, Title X funds and even Medicaid reimbursements for non-abortion services allocated to abortion providers are fungible. Many of the costs to operate such clinics are shared – rent, power, insurance, common labor, federal payroll taxes, office and medical equipment. So it’s somewhat of a ruse to suggest that not a dollar of taxpayer money supports abortion. This money may not support abortions directly, but it certainly does support abortions indirectly.

In a typical business financial statement, that’s the hair-splitting exercise of categorizing direct costs (cost of goods sold) and general and administrative costs. This is the typical “above the line” versus “below the line” classification of business costs and expenses. But both are deducted from revenue to arrive at the most meaningful number: the bottom line. And revenue must cover both to produce a profit.

Two days prior to leaving office, President Obama signed an Executive Order preventing states from withholding funds from any family planning service provider, even if they perform abortions. This order was overturned by a law signed by President Trump on April 13 (Vice-President Pence was tie-breaking vote) allowing states to apply more discretion in allocating Title X funds, including denial of funding to abortion providers. Plus, to the chagrin of Democrats, President Trump recently appointed antiabortion activist Teresa Manning over the Title X program.

To fully strip federal funding to Planned Parenthood, Congress should act to amend Medicaid law to disallow participation in the program by clinics that terminate pregnancies or to share costs with other providers that perform abortions. It could be accomplished by an uncomplicated one-sentence bill. In the meantime, with a pro-life president, Title X funds should be all but fully prohibited from distribution to abortion providers.

It’s time for conservative lawmakers – at the state and federal level – to not just talk conservatively in order to be elected, but to govern conservatively.

  • lauragail

    Defunding Planned Parenthood will not cause “back alley abortions”, because abortion will still be legal. It will only cause the “consumer” to be required to pay for the service received. It is time to stop the fear-mongering about carnage when there exists plenty of private donations to cover the costs by those “benevolent” donors who have no problem funding the demise of human life. Federal funding of Planned Parenthood is less than the moneys that Planned Parenthood funnels into its PAC funding from it main coffers. Im other words, PPact launders the moneys received from its Federal funding through its tax-deductible fund.

  • carlcasino

    I am Pro Life-Period- Defunding PPH will only cause the back alley industry to thrive. When I was a young welp public opinion would limit the out of wedlock and back alley abortions. How can the society be changed to eliminate or at least slow the killings? You cannot legislate morality. It’s been tried before and failed as expected by sane people. Changing minds will take as long as it took to destroy morality to start with so I don’t expect anything to change soon. I have always been stymied by the idea that progressive thought will go to the end of the earth to prevent a murderer or rapist to be sent to his reward but don’t even blink at killing a baby ? It’s a Double Murder Crime for a criminal to shoot and kill a pregnant mother and child but under the care of a physician who took an oath to Do No Harm it’s accepted practice. Maybe that’s the problem? Read your physicians diploma sometime—so and so is ALLOWED TO PRACTICE–Words have meaning just ask bill Clinton what the definition of “is” is.